|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So you don't have any
formal training in filmmaking… What
drove you to filmmaking and how did you get
your start?
I’m really just a frustrated writer.
I had been writing free-lance for a few magazines
and publishing a couple of newsletters when
I decided, four years ago, to move to Los Angeles
and pursue filmmaking. At first I started writing
screenplays, but just getting anyone (besides
my mom and sister) to read them proved next
to impossible. Plus it was quite lonely and
I didn’t feel like I was learning anything
about how to actually make a film. I figured
I had two options: go to film school or start
making films. I chose the latter because I’m
just not good with school. That being said,
I was very fortunate because I’d made
a good deal of money in the stock market and
I was able to finance myself. My first film,
Parents of the Year, took a little over a year
to make and it eventually sold to HBO and some
other broadcasters in Canada and Europe. I
re-cut a short version and it’s played
at over twenty-five film festivals and won
a bunch of awards. Last Friday it was featured
on 20/20, two years after I made it. Go figure.
Where did you get the idea for Maxed
Out?
Debt is the one issue that affects all of
us: old or young, rich or poor, black or white,
gay or straight, vegan or fast-food junkie.
Originally I wanted to do something like “Supersize
Me”—something light which kind
of poked fun at consumer behavior but then
hinted at something darker. A lot of reviewers
are comparing “Maxed Out” to “Supersize
Me” but I think that they are very different
films. In the end, I was asking a much broader
question: why can’t most of us get out
of debt? And though it starts out in a pretty
light place—this real-estate agent in
Vegas selling $6 million spec McMansions—it
gets pretty dark towards the end. I should
mention that I’ve always been a finance
junkie and I went to Wharton, so money has
always been floating around my subconscious.
Was financing difficult?
How did you secure funding
for this project?
You didn’t go into debt yourself did you?
I didn’t go into debt. I was lucky to
have made some money, and I had family money
before that. I prepared myself early on for
making the worst investments of my life, but
now it looks like maybe they’re not such
bad investments, so we’ll see. I know
a lot of people who spend all of their time
looking for money, and I empathize with them.
I’ve just been really lucky, but I’ve
been willing to sacrifice and take risks with
what I have at the same time.
How did you go about looking
for interview subjects?
What is difficult to get
them to speak with you about their debt?
Yeah, it’s very difficult to get people
talking about debt. It really is the last taboo
in this culture of ours, being in financial
trouble. I was talking to this guy who’s
in Debtors Anonymous, which is the twelve-step
program for debtors, and he told me, “being
an alcoholic, being a drug addict, even, is
kind of glamorous, is socially acceptable.
But being in debt, that’s not polite
cocktail conversation.” I think that’s
true, unfortunately, because so many of us
are in trouble and we need to start talking
about it. I’ve just seen too many examples
of suicide over this issue. Hopefully the film
will get some people to start coming out of
the closet and stop pretending that they’re
alone. The subjects we did find were ultimately
people who’d been through that sense
of alienation and humiliation and said, “you
know what? Maybe some of this is my fault,
but not all of it.” Those were the people
who were willing to talk. At first I found
a lot of these people off of the Internet,
because initially I was looking for those “out
there” stories, the really extreme ones.
But then I kind of developed this network of
counselors and academics and radio hosts and
journalists who referred me to people who were
willing to talk. That being said, a lot of
people cancelled on us or just disappeared.
But I can’t express how grateful I am
to the people who gave it up for us. We even
shot a few debt collectors at work!
It was really shocking to see that
people had committed suicide and had gone
missing because of their debt problems… Did
you find a lot of these types of cases?
That’s a really good question. I remember
when I realized, in our first interview, that
this was an emotional subject more than anything.
You think about debt and credit cards and you
probably assume, “okay, this is going
to be kind of academic, informational.” But
I can tell you that this is by far the most
emotional, visceral, loaded topic you can imagine.
We heard suicide mentioned at every turn. Because
money defines us and money is what facilitates
our lifestyles, our identities. Lose it and
what do you have left? I know that a lot of
people will criticize us for finding these “extreme” cases
and these really emotional people, but, you
know what? These people aren’t the exceptions
and people who watch the film better realize
that.
What was the most surprising thing
you discovered about the
credit industry?
The most surprising thing I learned was that
your credit score—this determines how
much credit you get—has nothing to do
with your income. In other words, it has nothing
to do with whether you can pay it back or not.
That’s why college kids and retired widows
and people who’ve just declared bankruptcy
are getting deluged with credit offers. It’s
not only unethical, it’s ultimately going
to haunt these financial companies.
Although this is a heavy subject you
did a good job lightening the
mood with humor… How
did you get Louis CK involved?
Thanks. That was very important to us—because
at some point, you can’t do anything
but laugh at how absurd it is. I think that
Louis CK is a phenomenal talent and he just
nails it.
What are some things that most people
don’t realize about how
credit works?
I think that most people think banks are still
rationing out credit to people who’ve “earned” it
or people who “deserve” it. That’s
certainly what they want us to believe. But
the truth is that banks are pushing credit
onto people who will pay them the highest fees
and the highest interest rates. That’s
the real definition of “valued customer.”
What kind of challenges did you have
with production?
Our biggest production challenge was that
we were crossing the country, multiple times,
chasing people who often changed their minds.
Of course, I can’t blame people for deciding
not to put their financial problems front and
center for all the world to see, but it definitely
took its toll. I lost our first sound recordist
because he just couldn’t stand sitting
around in a crappy hotel all day.
What kind of equipment did you use?
Did the equipment cause
any issues you had
to deal with?
We used the Panasonic Varicam, which was terrific.
The sound stuff we rented from Location Sound
and it performed beautifully.
How about distribution?
Did you make any deals at SXSW?
How did you go
about finding a distributor?
We had a couple of distribution offers previous
to SXSW, based on the rough cut, but we decided
to wait until after the premiere. We wanted
distributors to sit in a big theater with a
bunch of Americans to get an idea of how emotional
and how personal this issue really is. The
danger for us, I think, is convincing the industry
that this is an immensely engaging subject
for millions and millions of people—that
they want all of this information. They don’t
want a character assassination piece, or a
fluffy bit of reality television. They want
to know.
How did editing go? Did the story
seem to change much from your
original vision?
Editing was really tough. The editor, Alexis
Spraic, is just amazing. I can’t say
enough good things about the work she did.
She basically took a bunch of interviews we’d
shot and then went out and found something
like a hundred hours of archival footage and
crafted scenes that were compelling and impactful
without being manipulative. That’s incredibly
tough. I came up with the structure at the
beginning, and we ended up sticking to it for
the most part, but just finding the right balance
of humor, impact, archival and interview took
us over a year.
Did you ever feel like you were distorting
reality at all?
I feel like we were discovering reality. That
being said, when you create a film like this,
you’re creating 90 minutes of your reality.
People will argue with whether it’s the reality
or not. I’ve already heard viewers say, “you
went too easy on people for being irresponsible,” and
then, “you went too easy on the industry.” So
maybe if I’m getting it from both sides,
I’ve done my job.
What do you hope audiences take away
from this film?
I hope two things: one, that people, particularly
the older audience, which, incidentally, is
the group that’s really getting into
trouble with credit now, understands how the
financial industry has changed so that they
have a fighting chance. Watching a sixty-year-old
woman lose everything she has because she didn’t
think a bank would give her credit if she couldn’t
afford it, that’s fucking heartbreaking.
I don’t want to watch any more of that
any more than anyone else; second, if this
doesn’t sound too presumptuous, I’d
like to shift the debate. We’ve got the
Suze Ormans and Dave Ramseys and Jean Chatskys
and Jerry Falwells talking about consumer behavior
until they’re blue in the face. Well,
let’s start talking about the behavior
of the financial industry and the behavior
of Congress, which is supposed to regulate
it.
What advice would you give to new
filmmakers about making their
first documentary?
Do it. Get a camera, find a story and try
like hell to do it justice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|